Evaluating Technology--The Case of Parenteral Nutrition as One Example

Evaluating Technology--The Case of Parenteral Nutrition as One Example
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

In tertiary care settings, many patients due to any number of medical, physical, and/or logistical reasons must be placed on parenteral nutrition. The very specific dietary needs of patients, along with the possibility of food-drug interactions and issues around the chemical stability of intravenously delivered compounds make precision, accuracy and efficiency paramount in the prescribing, delivery, and administration of parenteral nutrition.

Curtis describes emerging technology in parenteral nutrition compounding, with much-needed advances in bar-coded medication preparation systems and in electronic health record (EHR)-to-compounder interfaces.1 These technology advances have: reduced the need for order transcription through use of CPOE; introduced a “photo-finish” check for hand-added ingredients using barcode-assisted medication preparation (BCMP) systems; introduced quality assurance checks with refractometry and laboratory; and have incorporated new techniques to detect microorganisms and endotoxins. Curtis explains how the use of contemporary parenteral admixture systems have reduced errors from 2-3% down to approximately 0.2%, or 2 in every 1,000 nutrition bags, and how use of BCMP has not only reduced errors but also turnaround times from order to preparation and delivery of nutrition bags from 52 minutes down to 34 minutes. Refractometry employs the use of a refractive index (RI, ratio of velocity of light to air to the velocity of light in the substance) so as to verify concentrations. There have also been advances in sterility detection, with the newer technology enabling this process to be quicker yet more accurate.

Curtis reminds the reader that there is still more research to be done and still more technological breakthroughs on the horizon. Pharmacy managers will need to stay abreast of these as well as employ effective decision-making that will include evaluating vendors for post-purchase support and discerning the right time to purchase technology with capital budgets, given that there will always be new technological advances. On a personal level, this is akin to the decision to buy a new mobile phone and which upgrade/model to purchase, given that there will always be new technology available. These management decisions have to be made in the context of various budgetary incremental improvements or decrements from upper administration of the organization and in keeping with the organization’s broader goals and mission as it relates to quality assurance initiatives.

Additional information about Managing Medication Use Processing Supporting Technologies and Automation can be found in Pharmacy Management: Essentials for All Practice Settings, 5e. If you or your institution subscribes to AccessPharmacy, use or create your MyAccess Profile to sign-in to Pharmacy Management: Essentials for All Practice Settings, 5e. If your institution does not provide access, ask your medical librarian about subscribing.

1Curtis C. Technology in parenteral nutrition compounding. Nutr Clin Pract. 2018;33:796-802.

​Authored by:

Shane P. Desselle, RPh, PhD, FAPhA, Professor of Social/Behavioral Pharmacy at Touro University California.

Create a Free MyAccess Profile

AccessMedicine Network is the place to keep up on new releases for the Access products, get short form didactic content, read up on practice impacting highlights, and watch video featuring authors of your favorite books in medicine. Create a MyAccess profile and follow our contributors to stay informed via email updates.

Go to the profile of Shane Desselle
over 2 years ago

When technology is always changing, when do you invest into new ones?