Adjunct therapies - Ultraviolet C

Ultraviolet C has been shown to kill bacteria in wounds without harming the adjacent healthy cells, and is a useful tool in treating chronic wounds that are critically colonized or infected.

Go to the profile of Rose Hamm
Dec 08, 2019


Ultraviolet (UV) radiation has been studied as a bactericidal modality since the 1930’s and reported in seminal journal articles.[i],[ii]   The increasing prevalence of multi-resistant bacteria has led to more recent studies of the bactericidal effects, specifically of ultraviolet C.  Ultraviolet irradiation is electromagnetic irradiation with the following wavelengths:  vacuum UV – 100-200 nm; UVC – 200-280 nm; UVB – 280-315 nm; UVA – 315-400 nm.  UVB has been used for phototherapy to treat dermatologic disorders such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis; however, chronic prolonged exposure to UVB has been linked to carcinogen formation.[iii]  The use of UVC has become the focus of research on cutaneous wound healing because the amount of irradiation required to kill bacteria is significantly less than the amount required to cause damage to mammalian cells.[iv]

UVC inactivates microorganisms by damaging the genetic material in the cell nucleus, especially in the range of 250-270 nm, known as the germicidal spectrum.  The peak germicidal wavelength is 262 nm, and most of the available equipment for wound treatment produces 254 nm.  The irradiation causes dimerization (defined as the process by which two molecules of the same chemical composition combine to form a polymer) of thymine molecules in the DNA, making it difficult for the nucleic acids to replicate.  This damage in the DNA of the microorganisms prevents both repair and replication of the bacteria in the wound.  It has been found that any UVC-induced damage to surrounding host cells can be rapidly repaired by the DNA repairing enzymes.  Thus UVC is considered a safe, non-carcinogenic intervention for reducing the bacteria that inhibit wound healing, including multi-resistant strains, and thereby improving healing potential. 

Studies to determine the amount of exposure needed to kill various resistant organisms were performed by Conner-Kerr, using 254 nm, 15.54 mW/cm2 output with in vitro experiments.  She reported 99.9% kill rate with irradiation times of 5, 8, 15, 30, 45, and 60 seconds and a 100% kill rate with 90 and 120 seconds, for methicillin-resistant s. aureus. For vancomycin-resistant E faecalis, she reported 99.9% kill rates with exposures of 5, 8, 15, and 30 seconds.[v]  Other studies have shown that UVC may be most effective in decreasing the CFU’s of P aeruginosa, as well as being most effective in wounds colonized with only one species of bacteria.3   In addition, UVC is considered effective prophylactically and at least prior to the formation of biofilm by existing bacteria, as higher doses of radiation are needed to penetrate the biofilm and inactivate the microorganisms residing in the polysaccharide “house.”4

Although studies on in vivo bacteria and healing rates are limited with small subject numbers, the following parameters have been recommended for the treatment of chronic wounds (including venous ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, and surgical incisions) in order to reduce bacteria loads and promote healing:

  • Use 254 nm UVC range which is easily produced in mercury low-pressure vapor lamps that are commercially available.
  • Prepare the patient by protecting  the periwound skin with a towel drape or a thin layer of petrolatum jelly; however, Yarboro’s clinic does not do this in order to potentially activate surrounding epithelial cells and wound healing factors, in which case the periwound skin must be carefully inspected after each treatment.3
  • Provide eye protection for the patient and the clinician.
  • Remove any existing dressings on the wound, including transparent films that have been shown to filter the UVC and decrease its efficacy.[vi]
  • Cleanse the surface of the wound, especially if there is blood over the surface, as studies have shown that the UVC is more effective in decreasing the bacteria count if the blood covering the wound is removed with pulsed lavage prior to treatment with UVC.[vii] If sharp debridement is part of the treatment plan, apply the UVC after debridement.
  • Hold the UVC lamp perpendicular to the wound bed, 1 inch or 25.4 mm from the wound surface.
  • Apply treatment for 60-180 seconds, depending on the bacteria and the wound size, moving the wand in order to treat the entire surface area.  May be applied 2-5 times per week.
  • Discontinue treatment when no signs of critical colonization or infection are present.  Excessive use of UVC irradiation may lead to UVC-resistance for some bacteria.4
  • Cleanse the wound bed after treatment and apply the appropriate dressing.

UVC is contraindicated for the following patients:

  • Have a history of or an existing melanoma
  • Have a history of invasive squamous cell carcinoma
  • Have human immunodeficiency virus
  • Have a fever
  • Having deep x-ray therapy
  • Have light sensitive diseases (e.g. porphyria, systemic lupus erythematosus)3

In summary, UVC is a safe and effective adjunct therapy for wounds that have critical colonization or infection present, and is faster in eradicating surface bacteria than antibiotics.  It is inexpensive and time-efficient, can be applied in any wound care setting, and is effective against many of the drug-resistant microbes that are difficult to treat with antimicrobial dressings alone.

Further information on the theory and use of UVC may be found at the following site:

Haan J, Lucich S.  Ultraviolet C.  In Hamm R (Ed), Text and Atlas of Wound Diagnosis and Treatment: 2nd edition.  New York: McGraw Hill Education.  2019, 511-518.  Available at

[i] Hollaender A, Claus WD.  The bactericidal effect of ultraviolet radiation on Escherichia coli in liquid suspensions.  Journal of General Physiology.  1936;19(5):753-765.

[ii] Rentschler HC, Nagy R, Mournomeff.  Bactericidal effect of ultraviolet radiation.  Journal of Bacteriology.  1941;41(6):745-774.

[iii] Yarboro D, Millar A, Smith R.  The effects of ultraviolet C irradiation in the treatment of chronic wounds: a retrospective, descriptive study.  Wound Management and Prevention.  2019;65(7):16-22

[iv] Dai T, Vrahas MS, Murray CK, Hamblin MR.  Ultraviolet C irradiation: an alternative antimicrobial approach to localized infections?  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther.  2012;10(2):185-195.

[v] Conner-Kerr T, Sullivan PK, Gaillard J, Franklin ME, Jones RM. The effects of ultraviolet radiation on antibiotic-resistant bacteria in vitro.  Ostomy Wound Management. 1998;44(10):50-56.

[vi] Rao BK, Kumar P, Rao S, Gurung B.  Bactericidal effect of ultraviolet C (UVC), direct and filtered through transparent plastic, on gram-positive cocci: an in vitro study.  Ostomy Wound Manage.  2011;57(7):46-52.

[vii] Taylor GJ, Leeming JP, Bannister GC. Effect of antiseptics, ultraviolet light, and lavage on airborne bacteria in a model wound.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75(5):724-730.

Go to the profile of Rose Hamm

Rose Hamm

Physical Therapy, University of Southern California

No comments yet.